March 19, 2009

  • Leaving

    This isn't the first time a colleague leaving the workplace.  I just wish it's not about the cutbacks. 

    In the past, every colleague leaves for one reason only: bigger fish to fry.  I miss each of them dearly, though I'm happy for each of them.  Some came alone and left with a family.  Some left for the love of his or her life.  Some got jobs with higher pay and promotion.  Some went for retirement, just for a second career pursuing hobbies.

    This year is the first time we have two colleagues being let go due to economic downturn.

    No one really knows who's next.

March 17, 2009

  • Word.

    AIG bonuses: Bring on the lawyers | Politico

    The only real difference between Bernie Madoff and the management of AIG is that when Bernie Madoff got caught, he pleaded guilty. When AIG got caught, it asked the government for $170 billion.

    And it got it. Now the American International Group is going to pay $165 million to its executives as a reward for the fine job they did in duping everybody.

    The Obama administration is officially outraged by this. It is stamping its feet. It is jumping up and down. It is issuing stern statements.

    But some are getting ready to pay. Some are getting ready to let the fat cats get fatter.

    Larry Summers, director of the president’s National Economic Council, went on ABC’s “This Week With George Stephanopoulos” on Sunday and said the AIG bonuses were “outrageous” but might have to be paid.

    “We are a country of law,” he said. “There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts.”
    Baloney. Contracts get abrogated all the time. That’s why there are lawsuits.

    It’s not enough for AIG executives to continue to get their huge annual salaries because of a government bailout — they want bonuses, too? Let them sue to get them.

    The way the courts work, they should get a ruling within the next century or so.

    But while we are waiting, the taxpayers should not stand idle. We should demand the immediate resignation of Edward M. Liddy, the government-appointed chairman of AIG.

    Liddy recently wrote a letter to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner saying the bonuses must be paid to the AIG executives because, otherwise, their morale might suffer.

    “We cannot attract and retain the best and the brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses — which are now being operated principally on behalf of American taxpayers — if employees believe their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury,” Liddy wrote.

    The best and the brightest? Is this guy serious? As of Sunday, AIG stock had gone down 99 percent over the past year because of these geniuses. But we have to worry they might quit and go elsewhere?

    Fine. Let them go. Maybe they can get jobs in Zimbabwe, where kleptocracy is official policy. I think some of them would feel more comfortable there.

    Liddy is scheduled to appear at a congressional hearing Wednesday. Actually, I would feel better if he were going on “The Daily Show With Jon Stewart.” That guy really knows how to interrogate.

    But I hope our elected representatives get to the heart of the matter with Liddy: Why do Wall Street fat cats believe they operate in a separate world, one where ordinary rules don’t apply and democracy doesn’t work?

    Monday afternoon, President Barack Obama accused AIG of “recklessness and greed.”

    And he said he is going to “pursue every legal avenue to block these bonuses and make the American taxpayers whole.”

    The key phrase, of course, is “every legal avenue.” We do not want our president to act illegally. But I hope he is not going to throw up his hands in helpless outrage if AIG lawyers say the bonuses must be paid.

    There are more than 1.14 million lawyers in America. Some 40,000 new ones are produced every year. And believe me, we can find a lawyer to say we don’t have to pay these bonuses.

    I really don’t think the public will settle for any less. Not from a president who promised change.

    Robert Reich, former labor secretary under Bill Clinton, told Adam Nagourney of The New York Times, “Never underestimate the capacity of angry populism in times of economic stress.”

    Angry populism? You don’t have to be a populist to be angry about this. You have to be something other than brain-dead.

    We must shake off the notion that our government is a helpless giant. Instead of shoveling money to these companies, we should be investigating them. AIG may be too big to fail, but its management is not too big to go to jail.

    Bernie Madoff could use the company.

March 15, 2009

  • Too much going on

    I know what my problem is.  I just have too much going on.

    Anxiety of when I'd be cut from my job.

    Anxiety of when he'd say no to me and this will be all over.

    Anxiety of when will I ever find a job, whether or not I'll be cut from the one I have now.

    Anxiety of having him living in a place where he won't be discovered dead for at least two weeks (knock on wood) if he fell ill.  Wait a minute, he is sick right now.

    Red alert...

  • 未知

    好像是一個機會
    要做的
    想做的
    該做的
    不該做的
    都做了

    可以把一切摧毀
    可以把一切建立
    可以是開始
    可以是終結

    一切盡在未知之中...

March 14, 2009

  • Regaining my edge

    Okay, I admit I have lost my edge lately for many reasons. The president is now more competent and intelligent, problems at workplace, personal problems wore my edge out quite a bit.  Here are what really worked up my blood lately that's outside of those three realms:

    AIG Paying Millions in Bonuses Despite Receiving Federal Bailout | Washington Post

    Okay, seriously, how stupid can you be sticking out your left hand to beg and pulling money from your right pocket of your coat to be given away?

    Jindal to reject $98 million, less than Sanford, Perry | CNN

    On one hand, I feel so wrong to give Piyush one more second of attention.  On the other hand, this guy is the gift that keeps on giving, next to Palin. Oops!  My bad... Then again, how stupid can you be to turn down money?  For political purposes?  Gambling one's political career away by playing politics?  The state that needs every last bit of federal aid it can get, and has the governor who would step on people's backs for higher offices rather than helping them.  Just too rich.  Then yet again, there are always Mark Sanford and Rick Perry.

    Republicans Split on Need to Offer Rival for Budget | New York Times

    Becoming the Party of No because you have no ideas is not the way to go.  There are plenty of incentives that can be offered to businesses, and still supports the conservative principles.  Tax breaks for businesses who do not outsource jobs overseas to keep old jobs around, federal grant offers for new business ideas, etc. are at least two ideas I can think of that will support businesses while benefiting employment in general, without the huge price tag like an economic stimulus package.  These ideas are from the brain of a stinking, no good liberal!  Where have all the real conservatives gone?

March 11, 2009

  • 愛得不夠

    假如是愛得足夠
    就不會到現在
    還在思前想後
    舉棋不定

March 9, 2009

  • 沒有甚麼值得羡慕的地方
    你走了
    其實沒有了壓力
    而我
    每天都在想着甚麼時候
    輪到我

March 1, 2009

  • The Entire Time

    The entire time we are shaking in our seats, terrified of losing our jobs, we ended up losing each other.